IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Lellig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 7 1 2 3 0.429 0.2528 0.2636 1.2873 1.3422
2017-18 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 53 4 7 11 0.207 0.1224 0.1215 0.6232 0.6188
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA — 34 0 4 4 0.118
2021-22 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC — 41 1 5 6 0.146
2020-21 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC JR 28 1 4 5 0.179
2019-20 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2018-19 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 25 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13662
Defenseman overall
#2366
Defenseman born in 1999
#3587
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Cockerill
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Panzeca
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Marty
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Spolec
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.