← New Search ↗ Social Card

Skyler Brind'Amour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-27 Country: USA
2017 · Round 6, Pick #177  ·  Edmonton Oilers Edmonton Oilers
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 NTDP-U18 8 1 0 1 0.125 0.0929 0.0918 0.4664 0.4607
2017-18 BCHL 52 10 14 24 0.462 0.1778 0.1845 0.6716 0.6969
2018-19 BCHL 52 13 31 44 0.846 0.3260 0.3207 1.2315 1.2115
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 41 14 18 32 0.780
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 41 3 17 20 0.488
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 29 2 9 11 0.379
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 34 4 9 13 0.382
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Quinnipiac
+67.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20709
Forward overall
#1025
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2012-13
1.536 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.