IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Woll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Bozeman Ice Dogs NAHL 52 1 11 12 0.231 0.0820 0.0771 0.2423 0.2277
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SR 29 2 21 23 0.793
2007-08 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 28 4 13 17 0.607
2006-07 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 25 6 17 23 0.920
2005-06 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 26 2 12 14 0.538
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2005-06 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+639.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18425
Defenseman overall
#1354
Defenseman born in 1984
#5526
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

James McDonald
Nazareth · 2015-16
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Leslie
Hamilton · 2016-17
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Todd Koritzinsky
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2013-14
0.550 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.