IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Tolibas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 — NAHL 39 3 4 7 0.179 0.0659 0.0666 0.1895 0.1915
2005-06 Wasilla Spirit NAHL 56 7 12 19 0.339 0.1247 0.1199 0.3581 0.3442
2006-07 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 35 7 13 20 0.571 0.2099 0.1914 0.6031 0.5500
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Augsburg D3 MIAC — 17 2 1 3 0.176
2009-10 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 17 3 2 5 0.294
2008-09 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 25 3 5 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2008-09 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+108.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9460
Defenseman overall
#1124
Defenseman born in 1986
#3371
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Sloan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Pringle
Canton · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.