IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Pringle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Aurora Tigers OJHL 50 4 6 10 0.200 0.0559 0.0586 0.1380 0.1446
2019-20 — NCDC 44 9 9 18 0.409 0.1153 0.1153 0.3312 0.3312
2020-21 Oakville Blades OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Oakville Blades OJHL 53 21 15 36 0.679 0.1898 0.1712 0.4687 0.4228
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 26 10 11 21 0.808
2024-25 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 10 2 2 4 0.400
2023-24 Canton D3 — SO 25 8 15 23 0.920
2022-23 Canton D3 — FR 20 8 8 16 0.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.80
2022-23 · Canton
+640.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30338
Forward overall
#1208
Forward born in 2001
#2734
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brock Krulicki
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Niko Happo
Manhattanville · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tal Halliday
Concordia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.