IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Antonio Demacopoulos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Elite 42 12 18 30 0.714 0.0856 0.0872 0.1640 0.1670
2017-18 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 32 18 7 25 0.781 0.1051 0.1021 0.2659 0.2582
2018-19 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 41 28 35 63 1.537 0.2068 0.1898 0.5231 0.4802
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SR 22 5 1 6 0.273
2021-22 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 22 4 4 8 0.364
2019-20 Fredonia D3 — FR 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2019-20 · Fredonia
+106.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28211
Forward overall
#1194
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Quagliata
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kittleson
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.