IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Carr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 25 1 4 5 0.200 0.0710 0.0716 0.2100 0.2117
2005-06 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 51 7 9 16 0.314 0.1114 0.1068 0.3294 0.3158
2006-07 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 52 7 9 16 0.308 0.1093 0.0994 0.3231 0.2939
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SR 27 10 9 19 0.704
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — JR 27 3 4 7 0.259
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SO 29 2 12 14 0.483
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — FR 30 8 6 14 0.467
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Stout
+432.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43813
Forward overall
#1393
Forward born in 1986
#4828
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Maxwell
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Silard
Hobart · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Gibson
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.