IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Toledo IceDiggers NAHL 41 2 1 3 0.073 0.0269 0.0272 0.0773 0.0782
2005-06 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 56 1 19 20 0.357 0.1312 0.1262 0.3769 0.3626
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 19 2 6 8 0.421
2008-09 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 17 2 6 8 0.471
2007-08 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 25 6 10 16 0.640
2006-07 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 25 1 7 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2006-07 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+291.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17657
Defenseman overall
#1539
Defenseman born in 1986
#5400
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Anderson
Manhattanville · 2013-14
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael McChesney
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Wetmore
Utica · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.