IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Larson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 56 4 18 22 0.393 0.1444 0.1440 0.4153 0.4143
2006-07 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 52 3 14 17 0.327 0.1201 0.1139 0.3455 0.3276
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SR 25 4 6 10 0.400
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC JR 26 1 6 7 0.269
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC SO 30 7 13 20 0.667
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stout D3 WIAC FR 27 2 14 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Stout
+398.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11803
Defenseman overall
#1245
Defenseman born in 1986
#4063
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ethan Hull
Bethel · 2024-25
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Santino DiNubile
Neumann · 2023-24
1.200 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Lloyd
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.