IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Larson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-10-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 56 4 18 22 0.393 0.1459 0.1455 0.4160 0.4150
2006-07 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 52 3 14 17 0.327 0.1214 0.1151 0.3461 0.3282
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SR 25 4 6 10 0.400
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — JR 26 1 6 7 0.269
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — SO 30 7 13 20 0.667
2007-08 Wisconsin-Stout D3 — FR 27 2 14 16 0.593
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2007-08 · Wisconsin-Stout
+393.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8677
Defenseman overall
#1152
Defenseman born in 1986
#3770
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Lloyd
Wentworth · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeremy Finger
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Miller
St. Olaf · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.