IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Flynn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Austin Bruins NAHL 52 1 6 7 0.135 0.0500 0.0500 0.1425 0.1426
2012-13 Austin Bruins NAHL 54 1 20 21 0.389 0.1444 0.1372 0.4118 0.3914
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 UConn D1 HockeyEast GR 33 1 5 6 0.182
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast SR 35 4 10 14 0.400
2021-22 UConn D1 HockeyEast JR 31 2 8 10 0.323
2020-21 UConn D1 — SO 23 1 5 6 0.261
2019-20 UConn D1 — FR 30 2 7 9 0.300
2016-17 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 24 5 6 11 0.458
2015-16 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 27 7 11 18 0.667
2014-15 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 10 0 3 3 0.300
2013-14 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 19 1 3 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2013-14 · Wentworth
+117.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11548
Defenseman overall
#1529
Defenseman born in 1992
#4698
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Heppner
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Grant
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kurt Weston
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.