IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Heppner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 58 9 11 20 0.345 0.1267 0.1262 0.3639 0.3626
2015-16 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 60 16 22 38 0.633 0.2327 0.2216 0.6684 0.6364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Saint John's D3 MIAC SR 26 8 13 21 0.808
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC JR 27 15 9 24 0.889
2017-18 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 25 13 11 24 0.960
2016-17 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 21 6 7 13 0.619
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2016-17 · Saint John's
+294.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27272
Forward overall
#1067
Forward born in 1995
#2309
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Salmon
SUNY Morrisville · 2008-09
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Deaglan Kelly
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Wallace
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.