IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Burgau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 54 6 11 17 0.315 0.1157 0.1123 0.3323 0.3226
2006-07 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 10 16 26 0.456 0.1676 0.1545 0.4814 0.4437
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Hamline D3 MIAC — 29 4 7 11 0.379
2009-10 Hamline D3 MIAC — 26 4 7 11 0.423
2008-09 Hamline D3 MIAC — 14 1 2 3 0.214
2008-09 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2007-08 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+15.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35045
Forward overall
#1146
Forward born in 1986
#3491
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Wyers
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Erwin
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bennett Weycker
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.