IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Todd Goehring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — NAHL 49 13 26 39 0.796 0.2924 0.2907 — —
2017-18 Chicago Steel USHL 26 5 5 10 0.385 0.2269 0.2073 1.1551 1.0553
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 AHA GR 37 11 11 22 0.595
2021-22 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 36 9 3 12 0.333
2020-21 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 12 1 3 4 0.333
2019-20 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 30 2 8 10 0.333
2018-19 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 35 4 4 8 0.229
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2018-19 · Sacred Heart
+11.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17633
Forward overall
#778
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Joy
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian DeLong
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Hennessy
Rivier · 2022-23
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.