IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Calhoun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 44 0 6 6 0.136 0.0506 0.0496 0.1444 0.1415
2006-07 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 55 8 20 28 0.509 0.1890 0.1759 0.5390 0.5018
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 — SR 26 2 10 12 0.462
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 — JR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2008-09 UMass Boston D3 — SO 28 5 8 13 0.464
2007-08 UMass Boston D3 — FR 19 4 6 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2007-08 · UMass Boston
+344.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8624
Defenseman overall
#1150
Defenseman born in 1986
#3751
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hudson Cameron
Fredonia · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Fuss
New England · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.