IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Calhoun Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 44 0 6 6 0.136 0.0501 0.0491 0.1440 0.1411
2006-07 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 55 8 20 28 0.509 0.1870 0.1741 0.5374 0.5003
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 26 2 10 12 0.462
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2008-09 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 28 5 8 13 0.464
2007-08 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 19 4 6 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2007-08 · UMass Boston
+349.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11506
Defenseman overall
#1230
Defenseman born in 1986
#3974
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joonas Linnavuori
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Caveney
Fitchburg State · 2008-09
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.