← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Dion Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 48 2 2 4 0.083 0.0296 0.0322 0.0879 0.0957
2006-07 NAHL 38 4 4 8 0.210 0.0748 0.0777 0.2220 0.2307
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 35 0 3 3 0.086 0.0304 0.0301 0.0904 0.0895
2008-09 SJHL 52 6 15 21 0.404 0.1035 0.0980 0.3038 0.2876
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC SO 23 2 0 2 0.087
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2009-10 · Wisconsin-Superior
+318.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16265
Defenseman overall
#1513
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.