| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | North Iowa Outlaws | NAHL | 48 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.083 | 0.0296 | 0.0322 | 0.0879 | 0.0957 |
| 2006-07 | — | NAHL | 38 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 0.210 | 0.0748 | 0.0777 | 0.2220 | 0.2307 |
| 2007-08 | Springfield Jr. Blues | NAHL | 35 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.086 | 0.0304 | 0.0301 | 0.0904 | 0.0895 |
| 2008-09 | — | SJHL | 52 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 0.404 | 0.1035 | 0.0980 | 0.3038 | 0.2876 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | JR | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.143 |
| 2010-11 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | SO | 23 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.087 |
| 2009-10 | Wisconsin-Superior | D3 | WIAC | FR | 25 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.280 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.