IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Moe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0338 0.0343 0.1000 0.1014
2006-07 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 55 3 5 8 0.145 0.0517 0.0499 0.1528 0.1475
2007-08 North Iowa Outlaws NAHL 39 3 7 10 0.256 0.0911 0.0834 0.2692 0.2466
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Hamline D3 — FR 16 1 2 3 0.188
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2009-10 · Hamline
+213.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#52423
Forward overall
#1728
Forward born in 1987
#6045
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Sanderson
Babson · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Conley
Nichols · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Walter Baumann
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.