← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Conley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 48 6 2 8 0.167 0.1062 0.1106 0.4995 0.5202
2015-16 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 56 10 5 15 0.268 0.1706 0.1697 0.8028 0.7988
2017-18 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 59 19 17 36 0.610 0.3886 0.3475 1.8286 1.6352
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Omaha D1 NCHC 37 10 11 21 0.568
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 25 9 10 19 0.760
2019-20 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 36 12 15 27 0.750
2018-19 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 35 6 7 13 0.371
2016-17 Denver D1 NCHC FR 28 3 4 7 0.250
2007-08 Nichols D3 FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14079
Forward overall
#574
Forward born in 1997
#2146
in USHL

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.100 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2008-09
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.