IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmy McCusker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 56 14 12 26 0.464 0.1649 0.1784 0.4875 0.5274
2007-08 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 58 17 32 49 0.845 0.3001 0.3099 0.8870 0.9159
2008-09 Alpena IceDiggers NAHL 58 13 11 24 0.414 0.1470 0.1445 0.4344 0.4270
2009-10 — NAHL 51 12 24 36 0.706 0.2507 0.2364 0.7411 0.6987
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — SO 17 1 1 2 0.118
2010-11 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — FR 15 2 3 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+95.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20453
Forward overall
#680
Forward born in 1989
#1348
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Radetic
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Schaly
Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.