IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Hutt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-04-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Santa Fe Roadrunners NAHL 57 6 18 24 0.421 0.1547 0.1581 0.4451 0.4547
2007-08 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 44 5 11 16 0.364 0.1336 0.1299 0.3843 0.3737
2008-09 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1837 0.1695 0.5284 0.4876
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 10 0 4 4 0.400
2011-12 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 24 9 10 19 0.792
2010-11 Curry D3 CNE SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 11 10 6 16 1.454
2009-10 Curry D3 CNE FR 18 2 3 5 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2009-10 · Curry
+111.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#36266
Forward overall
#1213
Forward born in 1988
#3664
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Patrick
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Hahn
Concordia · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Rivera
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.