IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Crowder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 52 12 9 21 0.404 0.1484 0.1515 0.4268 0.4356
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 4 11 15 0.294 0.1081 0.1050 0.3108 0.3019
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 3 1 2 3 1.000
2010-11 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 8 2 4 6 0.750
2009-10 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 19 6 4 10 0.526
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2009-10 · UMass Boston
+397.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39871
Forward overall
#1327
Forward born in 1988
#4224
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Woolley
Salem State · 2017-18
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Hughes
Bethel · 2011-12
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Brown
Bowdoin · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.