IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce DeFazio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 17 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 13 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 — NCDC 50 8 12 20 0.400 0.1631 0.1612 0.3215 0.3178
2019-20 Northern Cyclones NCDC 50 7 27 34 0.680 0.2772 0.2772 0.5466 0.5466
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC JR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2022-23 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC SO 10 0 1 1 0.100
2021-22 SUNY Geneseo D3 SUNYAC FR 4 1 1 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2021-22 · SUNY Geneseo
+212.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4033
Defenseman overall
#963
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gustav Sandberg
Nichols · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Venter
SUNY Potsdam · 2015-16
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Manley
Morrisville · 2021-22
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.