IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 52 4 6 10 0.192 0.0707 0.0707 0.2030 0.2030
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 57 9 21 30 0.526 0.1934 0.1839 0.5555 0.5283
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Concordia D3 MIAC — 20 1 5 6 0.300
2010-11 Concordia D3 MIAC — 27 2 6 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2010-11 · Concordia
+126.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10169
Defenseman overall
#1155
Defenseman born in 1987
#3583
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Bannister
Canton · 2018-19
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kearney
Williams · 2024-25
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Lippa
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.