IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jed McGlasson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 36 9 12 21 0.583 0.2143 0.2183 0.6157 0.6271
2008-09 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 56 15 28 43 0.768 0.2821 0.2733 0.8105 0.7853
2009-10 — NAHL 57 11 21 32 0.561 0.2063 0.1916 0.5926 0.5503
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 27 10 10 20 0.741
2013-14 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 22 1 4 5 0.227
2012-13 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 22 4 9 13 0.591
2011-12 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2011-12 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+56.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20917
Forward overall
#703
Forward born in 1989
#1440
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Yearsley
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Fauchoux
Concordia · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.