← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chris Margott Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 53 12 5 17 0.321 0.1972 0.2126 0.9451 1.0189
2003-04 Bay State Breakers EJHL 20 15 21 36 1.800 0.5333 0.5134
2004-05 Bay State Breakers EJHL 50 29 32 61 1.220 0.3615 0.3312
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Robert Morris D1 SR 36 21 23 44 1.222
2007-08 Robert Morris D1 JR 34 18 26 44 1.294
2006-07 Robert Morris D1 SO 31 12 9 21 0.677
2005-06 Robert Morris D1 FR 33 13 14 27 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2005-06 · Robert Morris
+136.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9893
Forward overall
#298
Forward born in 1984

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Babson · 2015-16
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.