← New Search ↗ Social Card

Reid Stefanson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 36 5 16 21 0.583 0.1123 0.1202 0.3678 0.3936
2015-16 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 56 18 31 49 0.875 0.1684 0.1714 0.5518 0.5616
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 54 21 32 53 0.982 0.3606 0.3517 1.0360 1.0104
2017-18 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 13 26 39 0.765 0.4511 0.4036 2.2967 2.0548
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SR 34 8 12 20 0.588
2020-21 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast JR 19 5 10 15 0.789
2019-20 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast SO 14 1 7 8 0.571
2018-19 UMass Lowell D1 HockeyEast FR 36 8 12 20 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2018-19 · UMass Lowell
+69.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9581
Forward overall
#439
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2013-14
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.