IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Wolfgram Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-11-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 54 2 7 9 0.167 0.0612 0.0613 0.1760 0.1764
2008-09 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 54 3 14 17 0.315 0.1157 0.1102 0.3323 0.3166
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 26 0 5 5 0.192
2011-12 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 27 0 4 4 0.148
2010-11 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 23 1 1 2 0.087
2009-10 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 2 8 10 0.345
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2009-10 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+302.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16758
Defenseman overall
#1537
Defenseman born in 1988
#5237
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wyatt Carlson
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Zeggil
Castleton · 2008-09
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Willie Hess
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.