IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Boldy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-05 Country: USA
2019 NHL Draft Round 1, Pick #12  ·  Minnesota Wild Minnesota Wild
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — NTDP-U18 62 29 47 76 1.226 0.9505 0.9709 4.5623 4.6603
2018-19 — NTDP-U18 64 33 48 81 1.266 0.9813 0.9524 4.7104 4.5715
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 22 11 20 31 1.409
2019-20 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 34 9 17 26 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.96
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2019-20 · Boston College
-19.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 27 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
100%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Taylor Cammarata
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
1.02 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.97 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.