IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devlin McCabe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Paul Academy USHS-MN 24 15 31 46 1.917 0.2361 0.2629 0.4654 0.5182
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 57 16 17 33 0.579 0.3415 0.3621 1.7331 1.8375
2018-19 — USHL 58 7 18 25 0.431 0.2542 0.2564 1.2903 1.3014
2019-20 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 24 9 10 19 0.792 0.2813 0.2813 0.8351 0.8351
2020-21 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 47 10 24 34 0.723 0.2570 0.2570 0.7630 0.7630
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-34.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16881
Forward overall
#737
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Alex Rauter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Cornell (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.26 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nikolas Olsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Nate Arentz
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Busby
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.903 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Arias
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.