← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakub Lacka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-20 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 HC Ocelari Trinec U20 USHL-Style-Czech 29 11 23 34 1.172 0.3620 0.3838 1.2521 1.3276
2016-17 HC Ocelari Trinec U20 USHL-Style-Czech 37 20 27 47 1.270 0.3923 0.3958 1.3567 1.3687
2017-18 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 51 15 15 30 0.588 0.3470 0.3408 1.7666 1.7348
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC 42 8 17 25 0.595
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 RPI D1 ECAC SO 12 1 1 2 0.167
2019-20 Rensselaer D1 SO 12 1 1 2 0.167
2018-19 RPI D1 ECAC FR 28 4 6 10 0.357
2018-19 Rensselaer D1 FR 28 4 6 10 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · RPI
+15.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

78%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10456
Forward overall
#463
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2005-06
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.