IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Schenfeld Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 51 1 11 12 0.235 0.0864 0.0839 0.2484 0.2411
2009-10 — NAHL 54 4 9 13 0.241 0.0884 0.0822 0.2541 0.2364
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 26 2 7 9 0.346
2010-11 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 28 2 9 11 0.393
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2010-11 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+402.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17776
Defenseman overall
#1599
Defenseman born in 1989
#5423
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tait Aptakin
Worcester State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Parks
SUNY Brockport · 2012-13
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Gutt
Utica · 2021-22
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.