← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Gutt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Elite 2 2 0 2 1.000 0.0923 0.0989 0.2290 0.2455
2018-19 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.1308 0.1400 0.3394 0.3632
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier 39 29 33 62 1.590 0.2079 0.2079 0.5395 0.5395
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 32 13 21 34 1.062 0.4332 0.4332 0.8540 0.8540
2021-22 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 49 18 36 54 1.102 0.4493 0.4182 0.8858 0.8245
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Utica D3 UCHC SR 29 14 14 28 0.966
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC JR 29 5 8 13 0.448
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC SO 23 7 18 25 1.087
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC FR 14 1 2 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Utica
-18.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3654
Forward overall
#134
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2016-17
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2004-05
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.