IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Parks Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 42 3 2 5 0.119 0.0332 0.0347 0.0821 0.0859
2010-11 Caledon Admirals OJHL 42 5 11 16 0.381 0.1065 0.1065 0.2629 0.2629
2011-12 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 45 7 13 20 0.444 0.1242 0.1187 0.3067 0.2932
2012-13 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 8 1 3 4 0.500 0.1397 0.1266 0.3451 0.3127
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 11 0 2 2 0.182
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 25 3 2 5 0.200
2013-14 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 19 3 6 9 0.474
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2013-14 · SUNY Brockport
+348.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#38641
Forward overall
#1584
Forward born in 1992
#3763
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Linker
Becker · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aman Sidhu
Northland · 2008-09
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Dvorak
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.