IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marian Fiala Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-18 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Owatonna Express NAHL 40 6 5 11 0.275 0.1010 0.1023 0.2903 0.2939
2009-10 Owatonna Express NAHL 57 7 20 27 0.474 0.1740 0.1692 0.5000 0.4862
2010-11 Owatonna Express NAHL 55 6 31 37 0.673 0.2471 0.2277 0.7100 0.6542
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 8 15 23 0.821
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 32 6 20 26 0.812
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 1 13 14 0.500
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 4 9 13 0.419
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2011-12 · St. Norbert
+117.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6359
Defenseman overall
#995
Defenseman born in 1990
#2271
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Gallagher
King's · 2022-23
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.