IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marian Fiala Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-01-18 Country: Slovakia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Owatonna Express NAHL 40 6 5 11 0.275 0.1021 0.1034 0.2912 0.2949
2009-10 Owatonna Express NAHL 57 7 20 27 0.474 0.1759 0.1710 0.5016 0.4877
2010-11 Owatonna Express NAHL 55 6 31 37 0.673 0.2498 0.2302 0.7123 0.6563
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 28 8 15 23 0.821
2013-14 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 32 6 20 26 0.812
2012-13 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 28 1 13 14 0.500
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 4 9 13 0.419
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2011-12 · St. Norbert
+115.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4456
Defenseman overall
#885
Defenseman born in 1990
#2068
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shayne Morrissey
Neumann · 2012-13
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barone
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Glaesmer
St. Mary's · 2006-07
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.