← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Jacques Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hermantown High USHS-MN 25 8 12 20 0.800 0.1013 0.1039 0.1943 0.1993
2017-18 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 58 9 16 25 0.431 0.2542 0.2472 1.2945 1.2587
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 37 4 5 9 0.243
2021-22 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 42 7 4 11 0.262
2020-21 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC JR 28 2 7 9 0.321
2019-20 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 29 0 3 3 0.103
2018-19 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 21 1 1 2 0.095
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2018-19 · Minnesota Duluth
-41.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22134
Forward overall
#1066
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
1.267 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2007-08
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2003-04
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.