IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joe Blake Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 19 1 1 2 0.105 0.0374 0.0394 0.1111 0.1171
2009-10 St. Albert Steel AJHL 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0530 0.0532 0.1456 0.1461
2010-11 — NAHL 49 2 0 2 0.041 0.0145 0.0140 0.0430 0.0414
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2013-14 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 3 0 1 1 0.333
2012-13 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#61142
Forward overall
#2264
Forward born in 1990
#6877
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Lauer
SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Elliott
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brennen Miller
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.074 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.