IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Beau Walker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-08-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 28 4 3 7 0.250 0.0928 0.1023 0.2647 0.2918
2010-11 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 56 21 41 62 1.107 0.4111 0.4322 1.1722 1.2325
2011-12 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 12 33 45 0.776 0.2881 0.2887 0.8215 0.8233
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 32 7 25 32 1.000 0.3713 0.3535 1.0588 1.0079
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 5 0 2 2 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2012-13 · Sacred Heart
+35.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7298
Forward overall
#314
Forward born in 1992
#180
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Campion
Saint Mary's · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Romero
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy Besinger
Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.