← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Tuscher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 9 15 24 0.436 0.1551 0.1581 0.4603 0.4692
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 22 4 3 7 0.318
2013-14 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 27 5 6 11 0.407
2012-13 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 23 1 5 6 0.261
2011-12 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 10 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#32701
Forward overall
#1229
Forward born in 1992
#3068
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Michael's College · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.