| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2009-10 | Trail Smoke Eaters | BCHL | 39 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 0.385 | 0.1482 | 0.1425 | 0.5589 | 0.5374 |
| 2010-11 | — | NAHL | 48 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 0.396 | 0.1406 | 0.1303 | 0.4175 | 0.3868 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.