IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Krebsbach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Owatonna Express NAHL 48 5 12 17 0.354 0.1301 0.1308 0.3739 0.3758
2011-12 — NAHL 37 5 13 18 0.486 0.1787 0.1708 0.5135 0.4908
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 13 1 1 2 0.154
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 23 3 3 6 0.261
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 21 2 1 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2013-14 · Concordia
-2.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8670
Defenseman overall
#1127
Defenseman born in 1991
#3120
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josiah Roen
Bethel · 2017-18
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wendorf
Hamline · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Beauvais
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.