IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mack Ohnsted Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-08-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 57 3 13 16 0.281 0.1031 0.1033 0.2963 0.2968
2011-12 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 6 34 40 0.727 0.2672 0.2545 0.7677 0.7312
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 28 6 11 17 0.607
2014-15 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 26 13 12 25 0.962
2013-14 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 25 6 19 25 1.000
2012-13 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 25 2 8 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2012-13 · Augsburg
+140.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25634
Forward overall
#922
Forward born in 1991
#2077
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2018-19
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Wynia
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.789 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Bombardier
Trine · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.