IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Rey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 41 2 5 7 0.171 0.0634 0.0659 0.1807 0.1877
2011-12 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 60 8 43 51 0.850 0.3156 0.3123 0.9000 0.8906
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 54 8 30 38 0.704 0.2613 0.2455 0.7451 0.6999
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 15 1 3 4 0.267
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 10 0 3 3 0.300
2014-15 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 33 2 13 15 0.455
2013-14 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 37 0 12 12 0.324
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2013-14 · Robert Morris
+26.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2874
Defenseman overall
#693
Defenseman born in 1992
#1291
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colton Alexander
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rob Sgarbossa
Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt McCann
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.