IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Koopmeiners Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Winnipeg Saints MJHL 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0183 0.0179 0.0600 0.0587
2012-13 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 38 8 13 21 0.553 0.0694 0.0632 0.1745 0.1588
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 23 2 3 5 0.217
2015-16 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 25 3 4 7 0.280
2014-15 Concordia D3 MIAC — 20 0 1 1 0.050
2013-14 Concordia D3 MIAC — 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#50064
Forward overall
#1920
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Niestrom
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jivan Sidhu
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jasper Korican-Barlay
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.