IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — NAHL 10 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 46 4 5 9 0.196 0.0695 0.0665 0.2064 0.1975
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 24 4 7 11 0.458
2013-14 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 26 5 1 6 0.231
2012-13 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 25 3 8 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2012-13 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+673.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#58636
Forward overall
#2159
Forward born in 1991
#6707
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jimmy Morrissey
Franklin Pierce · 2015-16
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Coby Downs
Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Piehler
Bethel · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.