← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Carroll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Northfield High USHS-MN 24 4 8 12 0.500 0.0633 0.0600 0.1214 0.1150
2016-17 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 55 6 34 40 0.727 0.2672 0.2605 0.7687 0.7494
2017-18 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 42 2 6 8 0.191 0.1124 0.1005 0.5716 0.5112
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Minnesota State D1 BigTen — 39 5 20 25 0.641
2021-22 Minnesota State D1 CCHA — 43 3 13 16 0.372
2020-21 Minnesota State D1 WCHA JR 26 3 6 9 0.346
2019-20 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 33 2 7 9 0.273
2018-19 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 29 1 4 5 0.172
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2018-19 · Minnesota State
+11.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8559
Defenseman overall
#1549
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lawrence · 2024-25
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2013-14
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.