IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Powers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 49 16 23 39 0.796 0.1133 0.1176 0.3302 0.3428
2011-12 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 57 15 22 37 0.649 0.2306 0.2295 0.6815 0.6782
2012-13 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 60 12 24 36 0.600 0.2131 0.2014 0.6299 0.5952
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC SR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2015-16 Utica D3 UCHC JR 26 2 8 10 0.385
2014-15 Utica D3 UCHC SO 26 4 14 18 0.692
2013-14 Utica D3 UCHC FR 9 2 2 4 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2013-14 · Utica
+144.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23318
Forward overall
#851
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Brink
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefano Alonzi
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Emil Elias
New England College · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.