IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Murphy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Chicago Hitmen NA3HL 10 2 2 4 0.400 0.0442 0.0424 0.1267 0.1215
2011-12 Chicago Hitmen NAHL 59 8 28 36 0.610 0.2167 0.2013 0.6406 0.5951
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SR 28 1 7 8 0.286
2014-15 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen JR 28 6 6 12 0.429
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 20 1 1 2 0.100
2012-13 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 — FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2012-13 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+4.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7970
Defenseman overall
#1076
Defenseman born in 1991

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ikki Kogawa
Wisconsin-Superior · 2023-24
1.056 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Berglund
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Korona
Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.