IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mac Jansen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-01-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 55 14 18 32 0.582 0.2138 0.2184 0.6141 0.6274
2012-13 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 60 32 25 57 0.950 0.3490 0.3391 1.0027 0.9741
2013-14 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 60 28 21 49 0.817 0.3001 0.2765 0.8620 0.7942
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 27 11 4 15 0.556
2016-17 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 28 12 12 24 0.857
2015-16 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 26 5 8 13 0.500
2014-15 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2014-15 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+58.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13995
Forward overall
#518
Forward born in 1993
#594
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Baptista
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Metheral
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.069 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Louie Kamienski
Endicott · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.