IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Steinhauser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — NAHL 34 5 10 15 0.441 0.1621 0.1682 0.4663 0.4840
2012-13 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 48 5 15 20 0.417 0.1531 0.1512 0.4404 0.4350
2013-14 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 44 6 6 12 0.273 0.1002 0.0939 0.2882 0.2702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#38540
Forward overall
#1368
Forward born in 1993
#4036
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Olivieri
University of New England · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tony DeVito
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gregg Amato
SUNY Brockport · 2007-08
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.