IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jude Warner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 38 5 9 14 0.368 0.1309 0.1417 0.3868 0.4188
2012-13 — NAHL 37 1 2 3 0.081 0.0288 0.0297 0.0851 0.0879
2013-14 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 41 15 23 38 0.927 0.1356 0.1339 0.4544 0.4486
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SR 19 3 7 10 0.526
2016-17 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — JR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2015-16 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 13 2 1 3 0.231
2014-15 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2014-15 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+58.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29462
Forward overall
#1120
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Carvalho
SUNY Morrisville · 2011-12
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Corcoran
St. Scholastica · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.