IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Vetter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 53 0 14 14 0.264 0.0971 0.1039 0.2789 0.2985
2012-13 — NAHL 40 4 13 17 0.425 0.1561 0.1592 0.4486 0.4576
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 59 7 25 32 0.542 0.1993 0.1933 0.5725 0.5553
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 8 0 3 3 0.375
2014-15 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 25 7 4 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2014-15 · Lawrence
+159.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8352
Defenseman overall
#1229
Defenseman born in 1994
#3010
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Ross
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wagner
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2004-05
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.